and so it goes


Blog For Free!


Archives
Home
2005 June
2004 December
2004 October
2004 September
2004 July
2004 May
2004 April
2004 March
2004 February
2004 January
2003 December

My Links
PICTURES-updated 02.08.05
The BEST Waste Of Your Time
Find Out Which Alcoholic Drink You Are
PRICELESS
David's Bowl
ODE to THEA, courtesy of Jenny Hansen
how i feel about you
SLP Lacrosse
tHe SiNgInG hOrSeS
What's your pImP handle?

tBlog
My Profile
Send tMail
My tFriends
My Images


Sponsored
Blog



worthwhile things
12.11.04 (3:44 pm)   [edit]
there are some things in life where acting sensibly is just about the worst thing you can do. one example is within a romantic relationship. so what if it's impractical? so what if it's a difficult situation? if you want something badly enough, you'll find a way to make it work. besides, nothing that is worthwhile ever comes easily. you're supposed to fight for the worthwhile things.

sometimes, we have the tendency to equate avoidance with sensibility. for example, not wanting to get hurt. the sensible thing is self-preservation, but within the realm of relationships, self-preservation almost always translates into avoidance. i don't understand why we do this. relationships are a gamble, we all know that. however, it seems to be relatively unknown that the same rules apply. when you bet it all, you risk losing it all. but then again, if you don't take risks, you stand the chance of missing out on the big win.

rifts are created by this instinct or inclination toward avoidance. when a difficult issue arises, we tend to want to pretend that it's not there. we fear up-frontness because of what we think it might amount to (ie, facing our demons, having to figure out what we really want, laying it all out on the table). so, what happens is, we run away from the problem, hoping that it will somehow resolve itself and that somehow, we'll manage to emerge unscathed. when in truth, all avoidance really does is compound the problem.

i guess what i'm trying to say is that, as a relationship grows, it's natural to get scared that you're putting too many eggs in this one basket (i hate cliches, but it'll have to suffice). it's a defense mechanism, especially if you've ever trusted anyone who later proved to be less than deserving of said trust. i don't know how else to resolve that fear, other than to say that you have to have a little faith in people. learning to trust again after you've been hurt is difficult; letting people in is difficult; admitting to yourself that you want or even need someone is difficult. it probably all boils down to this one question: is it worth it?
 
closing the distance
12.11.04 (6:48 am)   [edit]

it's amazing to me how my sister always seems to have a correct sense of how i'm really feeling. sometimes, i call her, she'll know that i'm just trying to pass time and talk about nothing at all. and sometimes, i call her, and she knows that i'm in "complete and utter distress"--in the fashion that only Carlos girls seem to have perfected--and that i really need her. it really is a gift.


just imagine how difficult it is to have any kind of relationship with anyone with whom you don't get to see everyday; that's the kind of relationship that my sister and i have had to make-do with for more than half of these past three years. yet somehow, i feel closer to her now, more than ever before. though it seems paradoxical, i really do think that there's a very simple explanation. these days, we have to try harder. these days, we can't just walk into each other's bedrooms every five minutes. these days, we can't just decide to spend the whole day together, and do it. the geographical distance prevents us from doing all the usual things that we would be otherwise doing. but that's okay, because we know to just try harder. 


proximity doesn't guarantee close ties. i only recently realized that just because you spend everyday being physically near someone, that doesn't automatically transfer into a magical communion of your two souls. nor does that nearness guarantee being able to sustain any pre-established relationship.  you can see someone everyday, be in close proximity, but still drift far apart. there is more to any kind of intimate relationship than just being able to touch each other. 


this summer is a perfect example of that. i said goodbye to a lot of people last spring, knowing that it would be a very long time until i would get to see them again. and throughout the summer, in my overly-dramatic way, my heart ached to be in close proximity to them. but i discovered that it's not physical nearness that binds people together. people don't have to live within a ten-mile radius in order to be friends. and yes, even though when we were kids, our best friends probably lived just down the street, trust me on this one: friendships aren't built on close proximity alone.


yasmin goes to school at brown in rhode island, and we've barely lived in the same house for years now. but we'll always be great friends. katie goes to school in north dakota. to her, i'll always be that "mean girl" from 5th grade who wouldn't let her sit next to me on the school bus. ryan goes to school at NYU, but we're still going to go sledding together every winter break, and we still call each other at random times of the day to just talk. yes, distance and the inability to see each other whenever we feel like it, makes it difficult to keep up-to-date on each other's daily lives. but the time apart just makes each reunion all the more sweeter. 


we have history. we have endless conversations about everything and nothing at all.  we have memories of shared moments. and we know, because of all these, that no matter where life may take us, however great the distance, the physical gap can always be bridged by the efforts that we're willing to put in. it can be a visit. but it can also be something as simple as a card, a letter, a quick IM, or a phone call. simple as it sounds, believe me, that's all it takes.